105-85
I know I haven't written an article on this subject since it's been around several years now. I would like to congratulate the Republican Party and all of the other Godly government officials that helped this happen! What am I talking about you may ask? I'm talking about this law:
-CITE-
50 USC Sec. 1520a 01/22/02
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM
-HEAD-
Sec. 1520a. Restrictions on use of
human subjects for testing of
chemical or biological agents
-STATUTE-
(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by
contract) -
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical
agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent
on human subjects.
(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this
section, the
prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a
test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a
medical,
therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or
research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against
toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related
to riot control.
(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment
described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed
consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in
advance of the testing on that subject.
(d) Prior notice to Congress
Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within
the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to
be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or
under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing
of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a
report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the
experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the
30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by
those committees.
(e) ''Biological agent'' defined
In this section, the term ''biological agent'' means any
micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or
protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally
occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such
micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its
origin or method of production, that is capable of causing -
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human,
an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
-SOURCE-
(Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, Sec. 1078, Nov. 18, 1997, 111
Stat. 1915; Pub. L. 106-65, div. A, title X, Sec. 1067(4), Oct. 5,
1999, 113 Stat. 774.)
-COD-
CODIFICATION
Section is comprised of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105-85. Subsec.
(f) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105-85 amended section 1523(b) of
this title. Subsec. (g) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105-85 repealed
section 1520 of this title.
Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1998, and not as part of Pub. L. 91-121, title
IV, Sec. 409, Nov. 19, 1969, 83 Stat. 209, which comprises this
chapter.
-MISC3-
AMENDMENTS
1999 - Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106-65 substituted ''and the
Committee on Armed Services'' for ''and the Committee on National
Security''.
http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t49t50+1734+0++(1520a)%20%20
Okay so let's break this apart:
"Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents"
Of course the government stands firm in support of not test stuff without our consent.
"(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by
contract) -
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical
agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent
on human subjects.
(b) Exceptions"
But there are exceptions, and for good reason!
"Subject
to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the
prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a
test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:"
Part C doesn't cover Part B. This means the government can do part B without the
persons consent. And here if part B:
"(1)
Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical,
therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or
research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against
toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related
to riot control."
That pretty much covers.....EVERYTHING!
AWESOME! Now we are starting to have the Theocracy we have always wanted! GOD BLESS AMERICA! And just think of what we could do with this law?
THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS STUDY
In 1932 the American
Government promised 400 men - all residents of Macon County, Alabama, all poor,
all African American - free treatment for Bad Blood, a euphemism for syphilis
which was epidemic in the county. Treatment for syphilis was never given to the
men and was in fact withheld. The men became unwitting subjects for a government
sanctioned medical investigation, The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in
the Negro Male. The Tuskegee Study, which lasted for 4 decades, until 1972, had
nothing to do with treatment. No new drugs were tested; neither was any effort
made to establish the efficacy of old forms of treatment. It was a
non-therapeutic experiment, aimed at compiling data on the effects of the
spontaneous evolution of syphilis on black males. What has become clear since
the story was broken by Jean Heller in 1972 was that the Public Health Service
(PHS) was interested in using Macon County and its black inhabitants as a
laboratory for studying the long-term effects of untreated syphilis, not in
treating this deadly disease.
The
Tuskegee Study symbolizes the medical misconduct and blatant disregard for human
rights that takes place in the name of science. The studies principal
investigators were not mad scientists, they were government physicians,
respected men of science, who published reports on the study in the leading
medical journals. The subjects of the study bear witness to the premise that the
burden of medical experimentation has historically been borne by those least
able to protect themselves.
The government doctors who participated in the study failed to obtain
informed consent from the subjects in a study of disease with a known risk to
human life. Instead, the PHS offered the men incentives to participate: free
physical examinations, free rides to and from the clinics, hot meals on
examination days, free treatment for minor ailments, and a guarantee that a
burial stipend would be paid to their survivors. This modest stipend of $50.00
represented the only form of burial insurance that many of the men had. By
failing to obtain informed consent and offering incentives for participation,
the PHS doctors were performing unethical and immoral experiments on human
subjects. From the moment the experiment begun, the immorality of the experiment
was blatantly apparent.
Many critics of The Tuskegee Study draw comparisons to the similar
degradation of human indignity in inhumane medical experiments on humans living
under the Third Reich. How could such callousness happen outside Nazi Germany?
To deny that race played a role in The Tuskegee Study is naive. All 600 subjects
(399 experimentals and 201 controls) were black; the PHS directors and most of
the doctors who studied them were white. Was The Tuskegee Study government
sanctioned, premeditated genocide?
In July 1972, Jean
Heller broke the story. Under examination by the press, the PHS was not able to
provide a formal protocol for the experiment; in fact, one never existed. While
it was obvious to the American public as a whole, PHS officials maintained that
they did nothing wrong. By the time the story broke, over 100 of the infected
men had died,
others suffered from serious syphilis-related conditions that may have
contributed to their later deaths even though penicillin, an effective treatment
against syphilis, was in widespread use by 1946.
On July 23, 1973, Fred Gray, a prominent civil rights lawyer, brought a $1.8
billion class action civil suit against many of those institutions and
individuals involved in the study. Gray demanded $3 million in damages for each
living participant and the heirs of the deceased. The case never came to trial.
In December, 1974, the government agreed to a $10 million out of court
settlement. The living participants each received $37 500 in damages, the heirs
of the deceased, $15 000. Gray received nearly $1 million in legal fees. Had the
subjects of The Tuskegee Study been taken advantage of? Although the survivors
and the families of the deceased received compensation, no PHS officer who had
been directly involved in the study felt contrition. No apologies were ever
tendered; no one ever admitted any wrong doing. On the contrary, the PHS
officers made it clear that they felt they were acting in good conscience. They
felt betrayed by the government's failure to defend the study they commissioned.
But as one survivor said "...I don't know what they used us for. I aint
never understood the study."
YEAH! Thanks to 105-85 we can do this
ANYTIME, EVERY TIME to the Demons and eradicate them from the face of the
Earth!!
God bless America! THE NATION FOUNDED ON CHRISTIAN VALUES AND STILL SHOWING TRUE! WOOOOT!!
It's about some time some clean these filthy Niggers up! They are stinking up the place with their Nigger skin and stupid idiotic fart breath! HAHAHAHA!!!